I think the most under-discussed part of this — and where most people go wrong chasing the so-called best soccer picks — is the layer you hinted at w/ injuries as rate deltas. Most people treat lineup news as binary “good / bad,” but the real signal is the shape change that follows — different zones of ball progression, different pressing triggers, different set piece role owners, different shot quality mix. That plus starting from your own number (not the book’s number) is the whole difference between actual modeling and vibes. Any surviving edge is in the microstructure and in how we parameterize change.
“Best Soccer Picks Are a PROCESS, Not a Magical List”
Posted in CategoryGeneral Discussion Posted in CategoryGeneral Discussion-
Mosib sectorid 1 month ago
Hey everyone,
Everyone wants “best soccer picks.” The memes are “give me plays.” But the real edge is: you build your own number. Average punters start from the sportsbook line and then decide if they “like” it. That’s upside-down.
I start from my model number (expected goals, adjusted shot quality, travel penalty, injuries as rate deltas not binary on/off). Then I compare vs market. If I’m ±0.15 xG off market, I don’t bet. If I’m ±0.35+ xG off market, maybe a play. Soccer totals are noisy; sides are thin edges. Bankroll management protects you more than any individual pick.
-
Naxipom foboxs 1 month ago