Anyone else seeing 4x growth from matchmaking ads?

I’ve been running campaigns in the dating niche for a while, but lately, I’ve noticed something interesting—matchmaking ads seem to be blowing up faster than before. I’m not talking about the typical “get matches now” kind of growth. I mean 4x or more, especially for brands using programmatic ads. Has anyone else noticed that shift too?

At first, I thought maybe it was just the usual seasonal spike or a coincidence with Valentine’s promotions. But the numbers kept climbing month after month. What’s crazy is that the brands using programmatic platforms are the ones leading this charge. And honestly, that got me curious enough to dig deeper.

---

Where I Started Noticing the Change

A few months back, I was managing ad spend for a small matchmaking app that focused on serious relationships, not casual dating. We’d always done okay with social media ads and Google search. The performance was predictable—some peaks, some slow weeks, and nothing game-changing.

Then someone on my team suggested we test programmatic ads. I wasn’t too convinced. I thought, “Isn’t programmatic too broad for niche dating audiences?” But after watching how other matchmaking brands were suddenly getting more traction, I figured it was worth experimenting with.

---

The Challenge: Getting the Right Audience

If you’ve ever promoted matchmaking services, you know the hardest part isn’t just attracting users—it’s attracting the right users. You can get clicks all day, but if those clicks are from people not actually looking for something meaningful, your conversions tank.

That’s where traditional ad placements can feel limited. You’re often stuck targeting interest-based audiences or demographic filters that don’t always tell the full story. With programmatic ads, though, the difference became pretty clear once we started testing.

---

What Surprised Me About Programmatic Ads

The first thing that stood out was how automated the targeting process felt—but in a good way. Instead of manually guessing what kind of people might click on our ads, the system was constantly learning and optimizing in real time.

It started placing our ads where potential users were genuinely engaging, not just scrolling. Within the first few weeks, engagement jumped by almost 40%, and conversions followed. It wasn’t instant magic, but it felt like we’d unlocked a new layer of audience understanding.

One thing I also learned is that matchmaking brands seem to benefit a lot from contextual placements. For example, ads shown on lifestyle blogs, relationship advice sites, or community-driven platforms performed way better than generic display placements. It made sense—people reading about relationships are usually in the mindset for it.

---

What Didn’t Work So Well

Of course, not everything clicked right away. I tried retargeting everyone who visited our landing page, thinking it’d seal the deal. But that backfired. The pool was too broad, and we ended up spending on users who were just window-shopping.

What worked better was narrowing down retargeting to people who spent more time on the site or filled out at least one field in the signup form. That small tweak made a big difference. It reminded me that even with automation, human judgment still matters.

---

A Personal Takeaway

After testing, tweaking, and running multiple ad sets, I started realizing how programmatic wasn’t just about reach—it was about timing and relevance. The system knows when to show your ad to someone most likely to engage, which feels like having an extra brain behind your campaigns.

This shift isn’t just my observation either. A lot of marketers have started discussing how matchmaking brands are scaling faster thanks to automated ad buying and real-time optimization. If you’re curious, there’s a helpful piece about the Growth of matchmaking brands via programmatic ads that explains the broader trend pretty well.

---

So, What’s the Takeaway?

If you’re promoting matchmaking ads and still relying solely on social or search, you might be missing out. Programmatic doesn’t replace them—it enhances them. It gives you more control over who sees your message and when, without manually adjusting bids or audience sets every few hours.

But like anything else, it’s not “set and forget.” You need to monitor performance, tweak creatives, and feed the algorithm good data. The smarter your inputs, the better your results.

For me, seeing 4x growth wasn’t about luck. It came from experimenting, failing a bit, learning a lot, and letting data guide the direction. I’d say if you’re in the dating vertical and haven’t tried programmatic yet, it’s worth testing on a smaller scale. You might be surprised by how naturally it scales once you find the right rhythm.

Anyone else testing this for their matchmaking campaigns lately? Would love to hear how it’s been performing for others.